Crypto Market Cap and Target Price Calculator

    Multiply a price by a supply figure and you get a market capitalisation. Enter a target price and you get the valuation that price would imply; enter a target valuation and you get the price it would require. This is arithmetic, not a forecast — the calculator has no opinion about whether any figure you type will ever occur.

    Calculator

    Prefilling copies values out of the cached snapshot this page already loaded. Every field stays editable, and choosing an asset never requests new data.

    What do you want to work out?

    Enter a price above zero and a circulating supply above zero to see results.

    A multiple here describes only the distance between two numbers you supplied. It is not a return, a projection or a statement that the scenario is achievable. The figures you type stay in your browser and are never sent to us.

    Updated 2026-09-11 18:58 UTC.(cached for up to 15 minutes)

    Market data provided by CoinGecko. Figures are cached on our server and may lag the provider. We do not guarantee their accuracy and nothing here is financial advice. Data methodology.

    What market capitalisation actually measures

    Market capitalisation is the product of two published figures: the current price of a single unit and the number of units a data provider counts as circulating. That is the whole definition. It borrows its name from equity markets, where share counts are audited and disclosed on a fixed schedule, but in crypto both inputs are softer than the tidy number suggests.

    The price component is the last traded price observed across the venues a provider aggregates, weighted in a way each provider chooses for itself. The supply component is a judgement call about which units count as in the market: whether tokens held by a foundation, locked in a vesting contract, provably burned or simply never issued belong in the total. Change either judgement and the market cap changes, without a single trade taking place.

    What market cap is genuinely good for is comparison of scale. It answers "is this network valued more like a large one or a small one" far better than a unit price does, because unit price is an accident of how many units were created. An asset priced at fractions of a cent with a trillion units in circulation can be larger than one priced in the hundreds of dollars with a few million units.

    The formulas, in full

    Nothing is hidden inside this calculator. It evaluates three expressions:

    • Market cap = price per unit × circulating supply
    • Implied market cap = scenario price × circulating supply
    • Implied price = scenario market cap ÷ circulating supply

    The multiple shown alongside the result is simply the scenario price divided by the current price. Supply is held constant in every calculation, which is a deliberate simplification and one of the limitations described further down.

    A worked example

    Take a hypothetical asset trading at $0.50 with 2,000,000,000 units in circulation. Its market cap is 0.50 × 2,000,000,000 = $1,000,000,000, so one billion dollars.

    Enter a scenario price of $1.00 and the implied market cap becomes 1.00 × 2,000,000,000 = $2,000,000,000. The scenario price is two times the current price, so the implied valuation is two times the current valuation. That proportionality always holds while supply is fixed.

    Run it the other way: enter a scenario market cap of $5,000,000,000 and the implied price is 5,000,000,000 ÷ 2,000,000,000 = $2.50. The useful part of that answer is the comparison it invites — you can look at which existing networks are currently valued near five billion dollars and judge for yourself whether the comparison is a sensible one. The calculator does not make that judgement, and neither figure says anything about what will happen.

    How to use the calculator

    1. Either pick one of the 25 assets we cover to prefill price and circulating supply from our cached snapshot, or type both figures yourself for any asset.
    2. Check the supply figure. If you want a fully diluted view, replace circulating supply with total or maximum supply — the maths is identical, the meaning is not.
    3. Choose a direction. Start from a price to see the valuation it implies, or start from a valuation to see the price it requires.
    4. Read the multiple as a distance between two numbers, then go and check whether the implied valuation is plausible against real networks of that size.

    Limitations you should hold on to

    The most important one: market cap is not money invested. If one unit out of a billion trades hands at a dollar higher, every other unit is re-valued at that new price and the headline market cap jumps by a billion dollars, even though a single dollar changed hands. Market cap is a paper valuation of the whole supply at the most recent price, nothing more.

    It also says nothing about whether the valuation could be realised. Selling even a small fraction of a circulating supply into a thin order book moves the price against the seller, so the aggregate is not a pot of money that anyone could withdraw.

    This calculator holds supply constant. Many assets issue new units on a schedule or burn them with activity, so a price reached three years from now would be multiplied by a different supply than today's. For an inflating supply, holding it constant understates the valuation a future price implies.

    Finally, providers disagree. Because circulating supply is a judgement, our figure, an exchange's figure and another aggregator's figure can all differ for the same asset on the same day, and so can the market cap each produces.

    Circulating, total and maximum supply

    Circulating supply is the count of units the provider believes are in the market and available to trade. It usually excludes units that are provably burned, and it may exclude locked or unvested allocations depending on the provider's policy.

    Total supply counts units that exist, whether or not they are freely tradable. Maximum supply is the hard ceiling written into the protocol, where one exists — Bitcoin has one, many assets do not, and an unlimited supply is not automatically a flaw.

    Multiplying price by total or maximum supply gives a fully diluted valuation. It is a legitimate way to ask "what would this be worth if everything that can exist did exist and traded at this price", and for assets with large unvested allocations it is often the more sobering number.

    Price and valuation are different questions

    Unit price on its own tells you almost nothing. It is determined by how many units the protocol created, which is a design decision rather than a measure of anything. A project can halve its unit price overnight by doubling its supply without changing its value at all.

    Valuation is the comparable figure. When someone asks whether an asset is "cheap", the answerable version of that question is what valuation the market is currently placing on it relative to comparable networks — which is exactly what this calculator makes visible when you translate a price into a market cap.

    Common interpretation mistakes

    • Treating market cap as capital invested. It is a paper figure derived from the last trade, not a record of inflows.
    • Comparing unit prices across assets. Without supply, the comparison is meaningless.
    • Using "if it reached the market cap of X" as evidence a price is likely. It establishes only what would be required, never what is probable.
    • Mixing circulating supply in one calculation with fully diluted supply in another and comparing the results.
    • Ignoring liquidity. A large market cap with thin volume behaves very differently from a large market cap with deep order books.
    • Assuming supply is fixed. For most assets it is not, and long-horizon scenarios are the ones most affected.

    Where the optional prefill values come from

    Prefill values are read from the same cached market snapshot that powers our market data page, refreshed on our server at most once every 15 minutes and shared by every visitor. Choosing an asset here does not trigger a new request to the data provider, and no figure you type is transmitted anywhere.

    Our data methodology explains the caching, the freshness labels and what we do when the provider is unavailable. Nothing on this page is financial advice, and none of it should be treated as a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any asset.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What exactly is market capitalisation?

    It is one number multiplied by another: the current price of one unit, times the number of units the data provider counts as circulating. Nothing else goes into it. It is a size label, not a measure of how much money has ever gone into an asset.

    Does a $10 billion market cap mean $10 billion was invested?

    No, and the gap is usually enormous. Market cap values every circulating unit at the price of the most recent trade, however small that trade was. A handful of units changing hands at a higher price re-values the entire supply on paper, even though almost none of it was bought at that price.

    Why does the calculator refuse to call a target realistic?

    Because the arithmetic cannot tell you that. Multiplying a supply figure by a price you typed produces a valuation for that scenario and nothing more. Whether such a price ever occurs depends on demand, liquidity, regulation and competition, none of which appear anywhere in the formula.

    Which supply figure should I use?

    Circulating supply is the usual choice and is what our prefill uses, because it reflects units the provider counts as in the market today. Total or maximum supply produces a 'fully diluted' figure instead, which is normally much larger because it prices units that do not exist yet or are locked.

    Why do other sites show a different market cap for the same asset?

    Providers count circulating supply differently — treatment of locked, burned, unissued and foundation-held units varies — and they average prices across different venues. Two honest providers can therefore publish market caps that differ by a noticeable margin.